The shamanic shadow in the old testament.

Jonah in the Whale, by Caroline MackenzieI have tried to immerse myself in the question “What is shamanism?” for long enough to develop an unbiased view. If I had simply done “a christian critique of shamanism” or something that hadn’t got sufficiently out of the gravitational pull of orthodoxy, I think the quest would have been less fruitful. Doing critiques based on ones already held point of view is natural, but may not afford one enough objectivity to make it a useful investigation that ultimately leads to transformation.

So after summarising (albeit in western-style bullet form) some features of shamanism, I gave the good old testament a scan to see if I could identify the “shadow of the shaman” on the landscape of those 66 books.

The seeds of the narrative

I am fascinated with what happened before monotheism was born, out of which we have been blessed with 3 major headaches: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The originating figure in the unfolding spiritual drama is Abram.

Here is a man from Ur (in modern day Iraq) who became the “father of many nations”. He was found acceptable to YHWH, after all that stuff coming out of the “fall of man” in the garden of creation, because he simply believed and this was “credited to him righteousness”.

So what exactly did Abram experience, imagine or believe? I doubt that it was anything resembling what most people today imagine. It has none of the baggage that constitutes the core – at a semi educated guess – of modern religious sensibility. I’m not going to give you an answer to that question of authentic, original context, because I believe that we should apply our imaginations to what was happening in the great exchange between the “Living God” and a Chaldean called Abram. If we can successfully transcend our 3rd millennium religious mindsets, stripping away countless layers of religion and culture, we may be able to regain something of the primal roots of our spirituality.

Back to the topic at hand. Based on my “list” of shamanic characteristics and a quick reading of the pentateuch, poetry and prophets, I was surprised at how this tale of the world resonated with a primal, shamanic quality. Here are some moments and images where primal spiritual elements emerge from the narrative commonly accepted as representing the foundation of our so-called civilisation.

The ongoing presence

Abram enacts a ritual without any precedent in the text, involving livestock and birds. He then finds himself in the thick darkness of an altered state, and has visions of the divine.  “As the sun was setting, Abram fell into a deep sleep, and a thick and dreadful darkness came over him.” (Gen 15:10)

Abram makes a covenant, wherein his name is changed to Abraham, (the “ah” being inserted as part of the name Jehovah). [Ed – This is probably incorrect, see Gareths comment] The story then starts to unfold down the generations.

Jacob wrestles with a spiritual being (the “man”), through the night, and receives a wounding that was to remind him of this experience for the rest of his life. This wounded healer motif appears in all authentic shamanic accounts. In this rite he is given the new name Israel, meaning “he who struggles with God” (Gen 32:24)

Jacob was left alone, and a man wrestled with him till daybreak. When the man saw that he could not overpower him, he touched the socket of Jacob’s hip so that his hip was wrenched as he wrestled with the man. Then the man said, “Let me go, for it is daybreak.” But Jacob replied, “I will not let you go unless you bless me.” The man asked him, “What is your name?” “Jacob,” he answered. Then the man said, “Your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel, because you have struggled with God and with men and have overcome.”

Joseph dreams about sheaves of grain, and stars, and takes this to be instructive and more real that his material surroundings, even when his life was under threat as a result. (Gen 37)

Moses, perhaps the primary shamanic figure of the old testament, sees the terrifying vision of a burning bush as a blazing icon of unseen divinity. YHWH says to him,

“Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground …  I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.” (Exodus 3:6)

At this, Moses hid his face, because he was afraid to look at God. When he enquires further, G-d says “I am who I am.” This is an encounter with primal being, sheer divinity, and the ancestral theme is core to the exchange.

He goes on to adventure up Mount Sinai and return with none less than the start of the Law, and a great split between written and oral culture commences, with mixed results. In addition to fire and smoke, all the base elements, roaring wind, rocks and water, form a key part of the Mosaic experience.

Elijah interacts directly with the forces of nature, controlling the weather in the name of the Lord: Elijah … said to Ahab, “As the LORD, the God of Israel, lives, whom I serve, there will be neither dew nor rain in the next few years except at my word.” (1 Kings 17:1) And in 2 Kings, “Elijah took his cloak, rolled it up and struck the water with it. The water divided to the right and to the left, and the two of them crossed over on dry ground.”

In handling over his authority to his protégé Elisha, a typically shamanic initiation and transfiguration takes place:

“As they were walking along and talking together, suddenly a chariot of fire and horses of fire appeared and separated the two of them, and Elijah went up to heaven in a whirlwind. Elisha saw this and cried out, “My father! My father! The chariots and horsemen of Israel!” And Elisha saw him no more. (2 Kings 2)

Marc Chagall - DavidDavid, like Moses, represents another major shamanic archetype, as the poet-musician-healer-celebrant. He proceeds with an exceptional confidence even in the direct face of evil: “Whenever the spirit from God [i.e. an evil spirit] came upon Saul, David would take his harp and play. Then relief would come to Saul; he would feel better, and the evil spirit would leave him.” (1 Samuel 16:23)

Moreover this confidence extended to his own sin. “Have mercy on me, O God, according to your unfailing love; according to your great compassion blot out my transgressions.” (Psalm 51, after his adultery with Bathsheba). He was able to face the divine not in fear, but with trust.

As a jester, David is without parallel: As he dances naked in front of his servants, he replies without shame to Saul’s daughter Michal’s pietistic shock: “I will become even more undignified than this, and I will be humiliated in my own eyes. But by these slave girls you spoke of, I will be held in honour.” (2 Samuel 6:22)

But most of us will realise that the Old Testament, in addition to thousands of intriguing stories, proceeds also through the tedium of unfolding laws (Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, for example), based on Moses’ Sinai transaction. Upon this is built the institution of monotheistic organised religion – the priests and the temple.

The Israelites are beginning to change from a nomadic people of faith (all that bitching notwithstanding) into a nation with an empire: King, a seat of earthy power, written laws, priesthood, and temple. It appears that YHWH is in two minds about their desire to settle, for YHWH knows that settledness will not necessarily bring either happiness or righteousness. But free will is free will; Oy Vey.

The Prophets 

However, despite all this, this most human desire to control, and all its attendant misery – defeat, death, exile, YHWH continues to reach out to his chosen people, largely through what we term “the prophets”. We have domesticated these wild ones in our canonical view of history, but if we get a little closer we will start to become aware of the most primal instincts, the most outrageous visions, and the most terrifying power.

Isaiah is a deeply poetic figure, whose words and visions carry exceptional weight in terms of illuminating the present and divining the future. He serves as a constant reminder to Israel where their healing lies, and moves ceaselessly between visions of hope and threats of judgement. In chapter 53, we read of the wounded healer, in what might be described as “the song of the shaman”

“He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering … we considered him stricken by God, smitten by him, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed.”

Jeremiah, in a direct encounter with the divine, is told: “Now, I have put my words in your mouth. See, today I appoint you over nations and kingdoms to uproot and tear down, to destroy and overthrow, to build and to plant.” He receives gifts of wisdom and power, but at the price of great turmoil, grief and anguish on the behalf of YHWH.

The life of Ezekiel is given wholly to the non-ordinary. His story emerges from the tragic exile in Babylonia. His account might be described as hallucination of the first order, and opens with these words: “the heavens were opened and I saw visions of God”.

Ezekiel employs highly symbolic imagery, windstorms, lightning, molten metal, strange winged creatures with human and animal features, jewels, and scrolls that could be tasted. In particular, he suffers this typical shamanic experience in chapter 3:

“Go, shut yourself inside your house. And you, son of man, they will tie with ropes; you will be bound so that you cannot go out among the people. I will make your tongue stick to the roof of your mouth so that you will be silent and unable to rebuke them, though they are a rebellious house.”

Daniel is another of G-d’s seer in Babylonia, a master interpreter of dreams, and all in the midst of severe political trials and turmoil. He and his cohorts are morally impeccable, standing up to the blandishments and temptations of power in an saintly display of righteous obedience.

Most significantly, they have overcome their fear of death, and survive unscathed in furnaces and dens of hungry lions. Even Nebuchadnezzar himself has this to say “In every matter of wisdom and understanding about which the king questioned them, he found them ten times better than all the magicians and enchanters in his whole kingdom.”

Poor Hosea is G-d’s fool, which is another shamanic role. Hosea is told to marry a prostitute, thus earning outsider status from the religious establishment, for the purposes of developing empathy with G-d’s feelings about unfaithful Israel.

Joel is another seer who is driven by a need to return to authentic faith. He tells those who will listen: “Declare a holy fast; call a sacred assembly.”. He speaks alike to the land, animals and people, and in one of his great prophesies says this : “I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your old men will dream dreams, your young men will see visions.”

Jonah, like Moses, is another archetypically shamanic figure. Similar to more contemporary shamanic accounts, for example the Angmagsalik Eskimos of Greenland who were eaten and regurgitated by bears (see Joan Halifax, Shamanic Voices), Jonah is rescued from drowning by being swallowed by a whale, stays intact for 3 days and is vomited up again. Thereupon he is isolated in the desert, having a vine appear overnight and be destroyed again by a worm.

Another seer, Zechariah sees visions of horses, horns, measuring lines, lampstands and olive trees.

The irrepressable wildness

Marc ChagallSo it seems evident that the shamanic shadow extends deeply into the narrative which lies at the root of the christian myth. It would however be unjustified to reposition entire old testament as a “shamanic narrative”, as it encompasses a broader set of concerns. Likewise, we can’t typify primal cultures purely as “shamanic”, as the shaman is figure at the peripheries of ordinary life. The paradox is that s/he is central to its underlying mythical, unseen, and non-ordinary existence.

But it would be fair to say that rather than transcending the shamanic, the old testament is a story of a stubborn people intent on settling and civilising away the primal by their attitude to their law, tradition and culture. This urge away from wild, creative, direct, ecstatic spirit is despite the enduring, numinous presence of the divine in their midst via their shamans, in the figures of what we rather tamely now refer to as the “prophets”.

In the light of characteristic shamanic features as identified in The shamanic shadow, let us summarise a few of the old testament narratives:

  • Calling: Abram was simply called out of the land of his birth, and Moses had the angel appear to him while tending sheep.
  • Initiation: Most prophets and leaders experience a rite of passage into this calling. Hosea’s unusual nuptials, or Elishas taking on Elijah’s mantle.
  • Communal role: Almost without exception, despite their marginalisation, the OT stories only make sense in terms of the community YHWH is trying to build. The notion of the individual seeker is entirely absent as far as I can see (contrast this with monastic movements emphasising a solitary view of redemption, be they christian contemplative, buddhist or hindu).
  • Authentic authority: Daniel vs. the Babylonians, David’s direct ecstatic relationship with the divine.
  • Connection with the cosmos: Much of the stuff of these prophetic encounters is connected to nature and it processes, cloud, fire, wind, worms, vines, leviathans/whales, excrement; Joel and Isaiah.
  • Peripheral yet central: Most prophets existed at the edges of their community, and often suffered banishment or death for their message. At other times however they were called upon to save those communities: Jonah, Hosea.
  • Playful yet mournful: Jeremiahs constant tears are contrasted with his great visions. David knew the lows and highs, the full range of the agonies and the ecstasies of worshipping YWHW directly and unmediated.
  • Jacob can quite accurately be described as a “wounded healer” whose experience marked him for life, and Moses knew too well his own frailty.
  • Non-ordinary: Every vision and dream, every angelic visitation, every encounter with YHWH or Yahweh’s Spirit must have been received in the liminal, non-ordinary state.
  • Mythmakers: All the deeds of YHWH, the breakings into the ordinary world of people across cultures and times, and especially YHWH’s direct dealings with the prophets, are the very stuff on which our myth of Divinity is formed.  

The seers and miracle workers, the poets and artists, all played a part in the myth we have inherited today. It was given to many in the OT narrative to be active mythmakers via their encounters and reports, their declarations and their visions, of a transformative creator who can be apprehended directly by any human being, but most profoundly via those in touch with immanent shamanic forces, who dare to look beyond the religeous mores presented to them via the priesthood, state or simply the norms of culture.

Published by Nic Paton

Composer of music for film, television and commercials.

18 thoughts on “The shamanic shadow in the old testament.

  1. Wow, nic! quite an impressive thesis. Most interesting and true. Looking at the ‘shadows of shamanism in the monotheistic traditions’ makes me rather excited as to the space this creates to parallel and converse equally with African Traditional Religions (and even African Initiated Churches). Unfortunately in my denomination the only real interaction with ATR and AICs involve white members trying to work out ‘if ancestor worship is sinful’. Rather embarrasing. Here now is a whole new base from which to start the conversation and mutual learning!

    Your brother must be an interesting conversation partner at any dinner table.

    BTW – i thought/was taught that the ‘ah’ in Abraham was his new name signify the promise to be Father of the Nations – Avra (father, abba) and ham (nations), not an inclusion of the divine name. Jehovah in any way is not a real OT name – it is the name YHWH with the vowels from Adonai (also a name for God) added on to it, as YHWH would not have been read out loud. The usual divine suffix is ‘-el’.
    (wow – all my hebrew classes come back to me!)

  2. Gareth – great point, I think you are probably correct. My biblical studies were 25 years ago, and I appreciate your input. I’m glad this is platform you can leverage. Watch this space as we move forwards…

    I will acknowledge my mistake but leave it intact for now.

  3. Nic,

    I like the artwork you have dropped in.

    After reading this chapter I’m having to reconsider my perspective on the comparative between Shamanism and Judaeo Christian-ism. Something is bothering me and I can’t put a handle on it. I think it has something to do with shaman’s closeness to nature and ancestors in contrast to a God in Heaven (sky-god / Shang di / Heavenly Father)

    Let me ponder and get back to you.

    Thanks again, a great discussion.

  4. Well done Nic, impressive post once again!!!

    There is a continuity between OT, NT and history. These same experiences, which we may case study from the biblical narratives, find analogous expression in many people’s experience.

    It’s worth noting that the motivator or source in most situations – OT, NT and history – is the Spirit of the LORD who comes to visit and/or remain upon select figures in the OT. The promise of Isaiah and others is that in the NT all who enter into the covenant receive this promised Spirit, who is Godde, and hence become empowered to participate in and effect Godde’s dream for the earth and all that is in, on and under it.

    FEOTU, there is an interesting but oft overlooked dynamic in the OT and NT that links humanity with the cosmos/creation as a whole. Those into new physics will like this. As all reality is one, so the effect of one couple – Adam and Eve – puts everything into disarry just as the work of one person – the historical man Jesus who is also the risen LORD – puts everything aright.

    The OT actually has a high respect for animals and the earth – e.g. Jonah 4:11 – just as the NT views Christ’s work as something not just for humanity but for the whole cosmos – Romans 8:22-23.

    We often forget that the earth and all that is in is given to humanity to take care of, though we are a part of creation and not above it. In order to put creation aright it is hence an economical prerequesite to put humanity aright. This is an untapped theme that is ripe for exploration.

    We should explore this more.

  5. It’s great to see someone trying to understand the OT from the perspective of those who first created and responded to it…. this book offers some helpful clues for entering further into that type of reality:

    Arnold Mindell’s The Shaman’s Body: A New Shamanism for Transforming Health, Relationships and the Community: A New Shaminism for Transforming Health, Relationships and the Community (Paperback) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Shamans-Body-Shamanism-Transforming-Relationships/dp/0062506552/ref=pd_sim_b?ie=UTF8&qid=1200576613&sr=1-11

  6. Tim
    I thank you for your considerations.
    “the motivator or source in most situations – OT, NT and history – is the Spirit of the LORD” – this is an interesting and moot point, under the heading “induced experience”. I will go into this later on, the question being one of ecstatic experience and whether this is given or engineered to some extent. Underlying it all, however, is a search for G-d.

    Shamanism offers a very alternative path to our current perception, but at the risk of being percieved as relativist, may just lead us to “the same place” … or better.

    Hmm… now if we chose one path / metaphor over another, don’t we do so with the understanding that what we’re rejecting isn’t going to do the job as well as what we are taking on?

    Lastly, putting humanity aright, in my view, is the same thing as putting creation aright. I sum it up in the word righteousness. Not piety, but cosmic healing.

  7. I see that this is quite an old thread now, but wanted to join in anyway! I Enjoyed the images and the post very much. Having been dismembered a number of times by my own spirit helpers, the stories of the OT have some personal resonance – Jonah particularly – and what could the voice from a burning bush be, but a shamanic experience, (have a look at my site http://www.shaman.uk.net). I always feel very sorry, however, that the vibrance and ‘realness’ of the direct contact offered by shamanic experience, in whatever cultural context, invariably is solidified into ‘religion’ and withers. The old adage that religion is politicised spirituality seems sadly true.

  8. Hi Shaman UK
    I thank you for your contribution, its never too late. I have still to visit your site – I shall do so – but just wanted to comment on your closing remark.

    I agree that raw spirituality, or any raw creativity for that matter, tends to solidify. But should we see this fact (entropy?) as necessarily “sad”?

    I’ve always been a bit of an iconoclast in that I reject that which becomes settled, especially in religion, but at the same time can we expect to always be at the cutting edge? Is the shamanic the only viable spiritual experience or is there a place for other aspects of spirit?

    I say we should be aware of the dangers of “politicised spirituality”, yes, but the fact is most people are not going to be at the place that you are. Do you reject their experience, or lack of it?

    Tell us about “dismemberment” – was it painful? How did it change you?

    Thanks again.

  9. There is much stuff to put on emphasis, but I am still questioning about these remarks on the sacred books (Abrahamic religions), they kept the major proposal (praise and redemption) during centuries and dragging back behind these chapters of confusion and questioning where for the current it is practically useless, but it would be a word key for other inside unlisted orders within these credos.

  10. Pingback: web page

Leave a comment