The Da Vinci CodeFiction and Truth in the the Da Vinci Code by Michael GreenOK so I read a bestseller, does that make me a sellout? I thoroughly enjoyed the Da Vinci Code for its sheer balshy sideswipes against religion, and for its pace and intrigue.

But I went one further – I read Dr. Michael Greens evangelical response, “The Books the Church suppressed : Fiction and Truth in the the Da Vinci Code.”

The first third I was somewhat annoyed at his criticism of a great page turner, the second third I sat back and acknowledged that Green was a far better scholar that Brown, and then just when I was about to award him the prize for believability, Green went and put his foot in it. I’m now going to let both these men stew in their own juices.

So Dan Brown is a hypocrite, big deal. He doesn’t want to be accountable to history. Let it be known you can put it off, but history WILL judge you, your own words will be played back to you, one day. Dan Brown is a rich man, and he has chosen to have his reward now rather than later, enough about him.

So why was I affronted by The Books the Church Suppressed? Essentially for its cold, hard, unbending orthodox position. I want to respond now, and what follows is a summary of my newly defined heterodox positioning.

What I am more concerned with is the hypocrisy of “defining” truth. Attempt to define truth and it’s not long before you are in error yourself.

The word orthodoxy, from the Greek ortho (‘right’, ‘correct’) and doxa (‘thought’, ‘teaching’), is typically used to refer to the correct theological or doctrinal observance of religion, as determined by some overseeing body.

Let’s start off by seeing some strengths of this approach.

– Historical correlation. It is important align ones beliefs with history, inner truth and experience need to have a fair degree of correlation.
– A place for tradition. Tradition is not all bad, there are fine, mellowed traditions and smelly, stinky ones.
– Learning from history. Presumably those creating orthodox positions have reflected a good deal on the past, in their construction of their position.
– The “Jesus event” was special and needs to be given a sacred space; orthodoxy helps to create this. OK you might not feel strongly about the short life of a carpenter at the start of the Common Era, suffice to say, the life of Jesus warrants a lot of attention
– Orthodoxy is valid and can be helpful, if it remains subject to life.

And that is where we need to start becoming a little critical.

– Orthodoxy does not honor nor create a framework for imagination and creativity. These qualities are about becoming, unfolding, and the ongoing act of creation. Orthodoxy, focusing on the past, says “It is finished. Think no further.” A more creative, future oriented approach says “It is not finished and we co-labor with G-d to complete it.”
– Orthodoxy  can easily be infected by ideology, and various unexamined elements like the urban suspicion of the rural (in its condemnation of Paganism) or the fear of the feminine (in its condemnation of the feminine divine). It can be easily confused with a cultural consensus, including the current 21st century one and that of the 1-2 Century. No culture is absolute but Orthodoxy attempts to make it such.

– Orthodoxy is an attempt to define a finite framework for truth which is obviously infinite… An inappropriate wineskin, to use the New Testament metaphor.

– Orthodoxy can address history and attempt to evaluate the Jesus event, but can say nothing about metaphysics and spiritual life. It can address the Logos (reason, written truth), but not Eros (truth as sensual, intimate and creative) or Rhema (spoken oral truth). It is a science and a tool, and needs to operate like any other tool at the service of revealed truth.

– Orthodoxy must be subject to life, not visa versa.

And so in conclusion, I would like to evaluate the effect of Orthodoxy such as that of Michael Green’s, on the Unsung Virtues.

Curiosity / Awe – Orthodoxy undermines awe, or at least prescribes what should be considered awesome.

Imagination – Orthodoxy is against that which is imaginative, often branding it heresy.

Generosity – Orthodoxy closes down and shuts out, is anti-generous.
Humor – Orthodoxy tends to honor sincerity over humor.
Paradox – Orthodoxy stands baldly against this.
Subversion – Orthodoxy silences subversive voices and disposes of subversives.

Sustainability – Orthodoxy may add to this by helping us understand what has been sustainable in the past. However to the degree that Orthodoxy has been infected by the industrial status quo which believes in fallacies of endless economic growth, it will militate against this.
Curiosity – Orthodoxy will stifle this.
Play – Orthodoxy gives a framework, but not enough freedom to sustain this virtue.

Score? Heterodoxy 8, Orthodoxy 1.
Fweep. Penalty to Orthodoxy; Heterodoxy is being ungenerous and somewhat dogmatic, subtract one point for hypocrisy.
Final Adjusted Score Heterodoxy 7, Orthodoxy 2.